Re: IRC access redux
"Brian Pack" <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:39:10 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.morlug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3D6C13B20B72411C957D3D45CFA3E42A@Upstairs> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Krovich" <[email protected]> To: "Morlug List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:19 PM Subject: Re: [Morlug] IRC access redux > All, > > Just wanted to clarify my understanding of the situation. WVU OIT's > blocking of irc is not just simple port filtering. They are instead doing > stateful inspection and dropping any irc traffic. If it were simple port > blocking, I'd be able to connect to freenode on port 80 as freenode runs > an irc server on port 80 as well as the well known ports for irc. I'm > doing what I can to get irc re-enabled, but it's slow going. > Unfortunately, people at OIT seem to think irc is evil. Using their logic > they should shut down all http and https traffic since sometimes those > protocols are used in hacking. When I first proposed a web page for a US Navy cruiser I was stationed on, the people I talked to were convinced that others could get into the ship's computers *even while the ship was underway*. Granted, this was back in 1994, but still. Go ahead and propose the sledgehammer approach. Maybe, hopefully, they'll see how silly their position is regarding blocking just IRC.