Re: Pipe to tar or other compressor
Jethro Carr <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:11:59 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.new-zealand.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 14:53 +1300, David L Neil wrote: > has anyone checked which compression tool might do better than 'the > others' when working on the likes of MySQLdump files? It would depend on the type of data contained in the SQL databases - for example, if the database is primarily records vs binary blobs..... Unfortunately it's kind of hard to say "compression XYZ will always be best for this usage", since everyone's needs are different. As a general rule of thumb, bzip2 is better than gzip for compression, but worse for speed. (although with modern CPUs, it's less of a concern) > (and ideally (and diverging from the OP's spec), I'd prefer that it to > work on a set of files not just one at a time) That's more a tar issue than a compressor issue. regards, jethro -- Jethro Carr www.jethrocarr.com www.amberdms.com _______________________________________________ NZLUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nzlug
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6bju8ACgkQDpNWragKym+PdQCeN/Wk18lzqYY0Jj+UIbyNrh3k rTYAoJP9bMYwslnQIM8qkPGhJACfamOq =eNQ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----