Re: Conditional Formatting in OOo Calc
David L Neil <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:54:25 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.new-zealand.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark, >>> This is great, a shame you can't keep stacking conditions. >> >> What do you mean by "stacking conditions"? >> >> ?condition formatting has a limit of three format choices >> ?condition being computed, eg pass/fail/null has a result set where n>3 >> ?condition being computed has more than three clauses/more than two >> AND or OR conjunctions >> ?... >> >> There may be a way... > > Oh i'm sure there is, but the UI is less than intuitive if that's the case. =agreed. =the limit seems arbitrary and reminds me very much of FORTRAN's trio (negative, zero, positive). It's sad that the OOo ppl didn't look at the likes of Thunderbird's message search which visibly ends with an 'add another clause' (+) button, and thus multiplies the number of conditions that may be applied. (although presumably there is a limit...) > Say I want to have different colours for the words 'yes, no, maybe, > other'. That's 4 sets of conditions. =at the risk of teaching grandma... (not that I'm calling you an old woman... dig, dig, dig - hole increasing in depth...) =I've also been hassled by users demanding this sort of stuff (grumble, "... users ...", mutter "...OOCalc...", hiss, spit...) =a solution might be to format the worksheet to have two columns: the first which color-codes the important results, eg yes/no, and the second which handles the secondary significance(s). =further to this, if the coloring is of the font of the information presented, eg 'pass', 'fail'... (will not work for background or outline color) it is possible to set the two* adjacent column widths to half of the width of your widest highlighted-word data, eg 'maybe' is the most verbose of your examples (above). Of the two, set the left column to be justified-left, and the right column justified-right. Now, as long as the field in the 'other column' contains null, the justification will cause the populated field to expand into/over its empty neighbor. Thus the two worksheet columns give you 2x3 conditions to play-with but the results appear to be one (column) to the human eye... * assumed to be two columns, could relatively easily be three (justify-center) and thus nine distinct condition-results but would start to become rather ungainly thereafter... =such solutions need to look at the UX very carefully! If the user is likely to print then block-color backgrounds are not printer-friendly. Maybe consider using (thick) colored outlines? =Use of color carries inherent (UX) risk in the prevalence of color-blindness... =Also, in a long list (regardless of media) where the pertinent data is some (horizontal) distance from the name (primary data field) - and particularly if there are intermediate columns which are substantially blank, it can be difficult for the eye to distinguish between narrow columns and between the rows... (?bring back lineflow stationery!) =I'm assuming that there is a fair volume of information/lines to present and thus the color-coding is to assist the reader's eye to pick-out specific exceptions or to gain an impression of a trend. So another solution may be to become more database-y about the presentation of information and invite the user to select which category of results interests him/her and filter accordingly - no color-coding required because 'this list' of results is all students 'of the same stripe or color'. -- Regards, =dn _______________________________________________ NZLUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nzlug