Re: Keeping hosts updated
Jim Cheetham <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:33:42 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.new-zealand.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+2knquHGw8y4OD9q=ggzLj2mZfpu-2V+J6SOO_WQytjnSfJEw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tomislav Skunca <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 16:12, Steve Holdoway <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 12:32 +1300, Jim Cheetham wrote: >> centos also offers yum-updatesd which will keep you up to date >> automagically if you trust them. Agreed, there are many tools for "just blindly update" but I don't really recommend that approach. Automatically grab the latest updated list of packages, yes. Download them, probably. But apply them without a human checking or authorizing? No ... >> However, the question also needs to be expanded to keeping $CMS updated Very good point. > You can try Puppet (http://www.puppetlabs.com/). There is a FOSS and a > commercial version with extra features. And back to Puppet -- if you have complex requirements, Puppet will satisfy them, you may have to do some foundational work but it will pay off in the long term. My main use-case for apt-dater is a large number of hosts that belong to different customers, and while I have responsibility for package update management, I don't have responsibility for anything else (i.e. the wider configuration). So Puppet doesn't provide sufficient benefits in this case; but it will in many others. -jim _______________________________________________ NZLUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nzlug