Re: PLUG vs PDXLUG confusion again
Russell Senior <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua D Drake <[email protected]> writes: Russell> Second, the PDXLUG webpage confusingly calls itself "Portland Russell> Linux User Group" in the html header title[1]. When this Russell> subject was last discussed publicly, I got the impression Russell> that PDXLUG was going to refer to itself as PDXLUG and not as Russell> "Portland Linux User Group", which is a title that PLUG uses. Joshua> PLUG is the Portland Linux/Unix User Group. PDXLUG is the Joshua> Portland Linux User Group. Confusing yes, but the title is Joshua> accurate as far as I know. Thanks for the reply. It isn't accurate. PLUG is both the Portland Linux/Unix Group _AND_ the Portland Linux User Group. When PLUG decided to adopt the Linux/Unix name it was with the understanding that both names would still apply. Indeed, the PLUG Clinic announcements have never discontinued using "Portland Linux User Group". <http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://server.riverdale.k12.or.us/~danh/> If you ask most people who consider themselves PLUG members what they think PLUG stands for, "Portland Linux User Group" is the most likely reply. -- Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.'' [email protected] _______________________________________________ PDXLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug