Re: PLUG vs PDXLUG confusion again

Russell Senior <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua D Drake <[email protected]> writes:

Russell> [...] PLUG is both the Portland Linux/Unix Group _AND_ the
Russell> Portland Linux User Group.  When PLUG decided to adopt the
Russell> Linux/Unix name it was with the understanding that both names
Russell> would still apply.  Indeed, the PLUG Clinic announcements
Russell> have never discontinued using "Portland Linux User Group".

Russell> <http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://server.riverdale.k12.or.us/~danh/>
Joshua> Unfortunately I can not help you, that is up to the
Joshua> founders. I have always know PDXLUG as the Portland Linux
Joshua> Users Group and PLUG as the above.

Who are the founders?  My understanding about PDXLUG != "Portland
Linux User Group" was from Robby Russell.

Joshua> Obviously the OSCON thing is not good but both groups have a
Joshua> pretty strong following. I am not really sure what could be
Joshua> done about it.

I'd suggest being vigilant about making the distinction if you want
there to be a distinction.


-- 
Russell Senior         ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.''
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
PDXLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.