Re: PLUG vs PDXLUG confusion again
Russell Senior <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Robby" == Robby Russell <[email protected]> writes: Russell> One, OSCON was recently confused again regarding the proper Russell> appellation of the PDXLUG group when it apparently (according Russell> to my sources) allocated an OSCON booth to "PLUG" that Russell> properly should have been attributed to "PDXLUG" so that you Russell> get the due credit for your efforts. Russell> Second, the PDXLUG webpage confusingly calls itself "Portland Russell> Linux User Group" in the html header title[1]. When this Russell> subject was last discussed publicly, I got the impression Russell> that PDXLUG was going to refer to itself as PDXLUG and not as Russell> "Portland Linux User Group", which is a title that PLUG uses. Russell> Could the people responsible for talking to OSCON about booth Russell> space and the webmaster, respectively, please address these Russell> two issues? Robby> I'll talk to Matt about fixing the <title> tags for the site. Thanks. Robby> Otherwise, what's the point of this thread? I don't remember making any other points, just those two. Robby> We have an OSCON booth and we're going at PDXLUG, [...] The OSCON people had apparently printed PLUG on a booth assignment sheet that was actually for PDXLUG, which led to some confusion amongst third parties. That confusion got back to me, so I am filing a bug report. PLUG at that time didn't even have a booth (I gather that they are going to be piggybacking on someone elses booth now). Thanks for helping to address these two issues. -- Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.'' [email protected] _______________________________________________ PDXLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug