Re: Notebook Memory Voltage
Paul Johnson <[email protected]> Wed, 24 May 2006 15:54:38 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1238760215== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1274638.5YMuXqtAsn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1274638.5YMuXqtAsn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 24 May 2006 12:46, [email protected] wrote: > Hey all, > I'm looking to add more memory to an older notebook (Thinkpad T23) which > uses 144 pin PC133 SDRAM. Most of the sites I've looked at list the > voltage as 3.3V but geeks.com has 3.0V listed on their site. With the Thinkpads (and many other relatively recent laptops), memory and h= ard=20 disk upgrades are fairly standardized. If it fits in the hole/slot, you=20 should be OK voltage-wise. And if it's a consumer device that's picky abou= t=20 300mW, it more or less deserves to be a doorstop... =2D-=20 Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [email protected] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber --nextPart1274638.5YMuXqtAsn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEdOQytFWT6GUYO7QRAuzpAJ47PVtbcqIMqCJeFpO1XjdbgGtSygCgj6cB SUyXSnGaX2+YYmln9cM6jgE= =VKp1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1274638.5YMuXqtAsn-- --===============1238760215== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ PDXLUG (a Portland Linux user group) mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug & #orlug --===============1238760215==--