Re: Packages?! (was: Re: Open Ca-Cert!)

Cory Bertsch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 18:07, Carla Schroder wrote:
> On Thursday 08 July 2004 4:30 pm, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> > Grishnav wrote:
> > 
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Gentoo is rice. Binary packages are fast. Debian > *
> >  >
> >  > /flamebait
> >  >
> > 
> > Sure... if the configure options are what you need, its way fast. WTF is up 
> with all these users who 
> > don't know how to compile things? RPMs and all binary packages actually 
> suck.. for the above reason. 
> 
> I bet you still rub sticks to make fire. On servers, obsessive-compulsive 
> compiling, and monitoring every single installed bit makes a bit of sense. On 
> a workstation, forget it. Then you use a nice package-based system with an 
> intelligent dependency-resolver, like apt-get or yum.

Don't forget Pacman!  (archlinux.org) ArchLinux is a really nice distro
and pacman is sweet.

<flame>yum sucks, apt for rpm is much nicer.</flame>

I would insert a smilie in here to make sure people knew I wasn't trying
to be an flaming ass, but I've used my self imposed daily limit of 3
smilies already today...

-Cory
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.