Re: Dovecot...

Joshua Schmidlkofer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tobias Rice wrote:
> Since we're on the subject, has anyone had any experience with Dovecot,
> http://dovecot.org/, secure imapd?
> 
> It looks very promising, and anything that boasts security as a
> fundamental is worth looking into. The only feature I see missing from
> it is shared folders, at least from a quick look over the docs.
> 
> Thought, feelings, opinions?
> 


Dovecot looks cool.  I chatted online with some people who like it.  I 
am against it for one reason: Shared Folders.   There have been rumors 
of working that out, but it is not supported yet.  Cyrus, however 
complex with authentication setup, has Shared Folders, Access Control 
Lists, and Sieve.   procmail is (of course) much more capable than 
sieve, but sieve is a decent tool.

I recently had to rebuild the entire cyrus database for a site.  We had 
corruption on two out of 3 drives in a RAID5.  [oops?].  The only bad 
blocks were in the Cyrus database.   I managed to recreate the mailbox 
database, and then cyrus reconstructed the mailboxes with the messages 
that were in the imap spool, and it was slick.

js

_______________________________________________
PDXLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 256 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBFQAfcweM6t71VHsRAmwyAKCNCNNTLEUy9/5MI+MrGkEjtkc9VACeJpds
AfSP8mRkl1VUGwb+X/xouD0=
=w12c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.