Re: [lq:general] [Fwd: [Consortium] Linux trademark]

Un article de NewsForge, datant de 2002, qui discute de LMI.

http://www.newsforge.com/business/02/04/19/1651220.shtml

Je n'ai pas lu le "sublicense agreement" au complet, mais si il faut
effectivement payer en tant qu'OBSL, je m'opposerais à ça.  200$ USD,
c'est abusif.



Robin Millette wrote:
> Hmmm, qu'est-ce que vous pensez de ça ?
> 
> Faudra-t-il débourser pour Linux-Québec, etc. ?
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject:
> [Consortium] Linux trademark
> From:
> Daniel James <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:33:33 +0100
> To:
> [email protected]
> 
> To:
> [email protected]
> 
> Return-path:
> <[email protected]>
> Received:
> from agnula.speech.kth.se (agnula.speech.kth.se [130.237.67.101]) by
> bureau.koumbit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352751C03052 for
> <[email protected]>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:33:40 -0400 (EDT)
> Received:
> from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
> agnula.speech.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C4EA1D4815; Wed, 29 Jun
> 2005 12:34:00 +0200 (CEST)
> Received:
> from dmzms01.aramiska.net (ns2.aramiska.net [80.242.32.2]) by
> agnula.speech.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD3FA1D480E for
> <[email protected]>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:33:58 +0200 (CEST)
> Received:
> from ip-80-242-41-60.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net
> (ip-80-242-41-60.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net [80.242.41.60]) by
> dmzms01.aramiska.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AB2110504 for
> <[email protected]>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
> Received:
> from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
> ip-80-242-41-60.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
> 1E7DC7F for <[email protected]>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:33:46
> +0000 (UTC)
> Received:
> from [192.168.1.42] (ip-192-168-0-4.internal.jcbimaging.aramiska.net
> [192.168.0.4]) by ip-80-242-41-60.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net (Postfix)
> with ESMTP id B651976 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 29 Jun
> 2005 10:33:43 +0000 (UTC)
> Sender:
> [email protected]
> Errors-to:
> [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Organization:
> Linux Audio dot Org
> MIME-Version:
> 1.0
> Content-type:
> text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-transfer-encoding:
> 7bit
> Content-disposition:
> inline
> Precedence:
> list
> X-BeenThere:
> [email protected]
> Delivered-to:
> [email protected]
> Delivered-to:
> [email protected]
> User-Agent:
> KMail/1.7
> X-Original-To:
> [email protected]
> X-Virus-Scanned:
> by Aramiska Arc
> X-Mailman-Version:
> 2.1.5
> List-Post:
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Subscribe:
> <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/consortium>,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
> List-Unsubscribe:
> <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/consortium>,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive:
> <http://lists.agnula.org/pipermail/consortium>
> List-Help:
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
> List-Id:
> "The Linuxaudio.org general mailing list" <consortium.lists.linuxaudio.org>
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> The Linux Mark Institute, now part of OSDL it seems, is attempting to 
> charge organisations which use Linux in their name - even non-profits 
> like linuxaudio.org:
>  
> http://www.linuxmark.org/forms/linux_licence_doc.html#Check1
> 
> I think we should resist this move on principle. It may only be US 
> $200 per year at the moment for a non-profit, but I don't think it's 
> really in the spirit of free software to go round mugging people for 
> money like this. I thought the name Linux was trademarked to prevent 
> it from abuse.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Consortium mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/consortium
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --
> Liste de discussions générales
> http://www.linux-quebec.org/mailman/listinfo/general