Re: j-core vs RISC-V
Steve Litt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.svlug |
|---|---|
| Organization | Troubleshooters.Com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 9 May 2017 23:38:56 -0700 Rick Moen <rick-IyCrq+X4Fdq2oZ/[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Rob Landley (rob-VoJi6FS/[email protected]): > > > (My opinion is you don't secure a system by _adding_ stuff. You > > secure a system by _removing_ stuff.) > > Absolutely amen to that. It continually amazes me how many people, > including managers in charge of computer/software architecture, refuse > to get this. I also agree. One could argue that with a simple machine you might have to add stuff: You have to add a lock and chain to my bicycle to secure it. But complex stuff: The more you add, the more nooks and crannies are provided for bugs to hide out, and the more bugs, the more opportunities for mischief. If I hadn't gotten such a good deal on my car, I would have insisted on the model below it, which features manual locks, manual windows, no security system. Back when I used to drive sedans, the first thing I did upon buying one was to go in the trunk and pull the wire that allowed someone who had access to the passenger compartment to unlock the trunk. If they don't have the key, I don't want them in the trunk, and I'm willing to accommodate the "inconvenience" of having to use a key on my trunk every time. SteveT Steve Litt May 2017 featured book: Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting http://www.troubleshooters.com/28