Re: arduino + drone fun
Rick Moen <rick-IyCrq+X4Fdq2oZ/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.svlug |
|---|---|
| Organization | If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Steve Litt ([email protected]): > IIRC your special formula was 6 lines. But the number of lines is > immaterial, as I'll get to later in this post... You do _not_ recall correctly. Two lines to install one init system and remove the other -- as I said: apt-get install and apt-get remove. An additional four lines were -- as very clearly explained on the page in question -- an embellishment beyond that deed, additions to /etc/apt/preferences.d/systemd to enforce a local policy that the undesired package must never be installed via resolution of dependency under any circumstances. This is not necessary if one merely pays attention to what dependencies are being installed and says 'n' if they are not to one's liking. Of the four lines to enforce that policy, two would always be there to accomplish that additional goal. Two others would be needed only in specific multiarch situations. And this is not a 'special formula'. It's bog-standard, totally obvious apt-get mechanics such as deb-using disto admins use every day. > That's not what I told you. What I told you was that Debian, at any > time, could pull the rug out from under your apt-foo, at which time > your choices become very much more constrained. No, sir. That was your _fallback_ position. That was when you switched to doing the Ivanova bit: 'No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. What? Look, somebody's got to have some damned perspective around here. Boom. Sooner or later, BOOM!' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEsFB2GPy24 And you've been saying that since May 2016, when I published http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Debian/openrc-conversion.html in part to test whether your earlier claim was correct, and find that it was simply not. In the earlier iteration of the claim, you and a bunch of other people had been going around since the days when Debian 8 'Jessie' was still the Testing branch, claiming that what I documented there wouldn't work. I guess y'all just never bothered to try. Meanwhile, returning to present-day matters: No boom, Steve. Also, managing package dependencies using equivs, unofficial package repos, etc., isn't brain surgery -- and, if you-generic can't figure that out, you-generic can nonethless follow other people's directions. > Meanwhile, deleted from the quoted context of my email was the fact > that both Void Linux and Devuan install on the Raspberry Pi, so Debian > and Raspbian just aren't necessities anymore. 1. I simply had no comment I desired to make about that. 2. Moreover, nobody claimed either of those distributions was ever a necessity.