Re: arduino + drone fun
Rob Landley <rob-VoJi6FS/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.svlug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/24/2017 01:15 AM, Rick Moen wrote: > Want to put money down on the adequacy in September 2018 of exactly the > measures I mention in http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Debian/openrc-conversion.html? > I mean, you could be right. Things break unless humans regression test them. I regularly send "hey, you broke X" emails to people (kernel devs, qemu devs, libc devs...) because they keep breaking stuff and not noticing until I poke them. (The embedded world at large waits for crazy people like me to try the new stuff, and then they install stuff trailing anywhere from 18 months to in extreme cases 7 years). If people are using non-systemd on debian, it'll get fixed when they break it. Given that devuan seems to basically be debian with something like your conversion applied to the install image, presumably they'll poke upstream when they inevitably break stuff. If the devuan guys fork away from debian to the point debian doesn't get feedback, and it manages to suck away all the non-systemd guys, then yeah then debian would break. But it seems unlikely. (That said, these days I'm using devuan chroots/containers rather than debian ones when I need something newer than ubuntu 14.04. It's easier and cleaner than ripping systemd it out of debian, and my response to systemd remains somewhere between "death first" and "android as a dev environment is more appealing". I _don't_ regularly test current debian, and if devuan stopped working I'd probably put more effort into workstation android than try to fix it...) Rob