Linux vs Sun: was Blockchain
Steve Litt <[email protected]> Sat, 30 Jun 2018 19:08:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.svlug |
|---|---|
| Organization | Troubleshooters.Com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:21:12 +0000 Karen Shaeffer <shaeffer-IwRZ8fqS3AoztatW0fm/[email protected]> wrote: > During the emergence of the dot-com bust, I was doing linux systems > engineering work at startups. One of my routine tasks was performance > analysis comparing the performance of application stacks running on > intel-linux versus sun-solaris. In a price-performance comparison, > linux-intel was an order of magnitude more competitive than > sun-solaris was in the context of comparable hardware scale. Sure, > sun-solaris was an awesome example of highly optimized hw-OS at > scale. And at scale this meant huge extremely expensive sun systems. > But the market had turned to using low-end, COTS linux-intel systems > in server farms. And Sun's low end solaris systems were not highly > optimized. Quite the opposite. These low end intel-linux HW-OS > systems were so much more cost effective than sun's solution it was a > no brainer for companies to adopt intel COTS hw running linux. And > this led to the fall of Sun Microsystems IMHO. All the preceding, and in addition GNU/Linux on commodity hardware enabled almost anybody to get into the game. SteveT Steve Litt June 2018 featured book: Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting http://www.troubleshooters.com/28