Re: : sipxecs behind NAT
Dave Cramer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.tolug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADK3HH+Fh6b1zojSemvy2stx6PpRXP1H2+tnfDEvoGNYzZZcNw@mail.gmail.com> |
This is my masquerade rule: MASQUERADE all -- 192.168.122.0/24 !192.168.122.0/24 I'm curious why sipxecs would even put the internal IP in the packet ? Dave Cramer On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jamon Camisso <jamon.camisso-H217xnMUJC0sA/[email protected]>wrote: > On 03/20/2014 11:18 AM, Dave Cramer wrote: > > I have almost everything working, except RTP events once the call is > > established. I've tracked it down to the fact that the phone is sending > the > > RTP events to the internal IP address behind the NAT. I have setup the > > external address on the server. > > > > Any ideas ? > > Sounds like a missing MASQUERADE rule if it is getting the internal IP. > > Given you have an established connection I assume your FORWARD rules are > working. > > Cheers, Jamon > > -- > The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/ > TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns > How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists >