Re: : sipxecs behind NAT
Dave Cramer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.tolug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADK3HHJ3sXCk_xs5j=y7-Hjdx65i-fvtGgPk3j808+4f72cXCw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Lennart Sorensen < lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:44:33AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote: > > This is my masquerade rule: > > > > MASQUERADE all -- 192.168.122.0/24 !192.168.122.0/24 > > > > I'm curious why sipxecs would even put the internal IP in the packet ? > > Do you have the sip conntrack helper module loaded on your router? > > SIP is one of the protocols that needs help to go through nat, because > the packets include internal IPs in them. > > Len, I didn't but I just loaded them with similar results Dave