Re: : Put and delete - HTTP method
Mauro Souza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.tolug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEZ_B6NUN5PVrqWYUgguRznUBR9F2V9Xm4n6B+W+Hx1SkxqdHw@mail.gmail.com> |
For me, it looks like PUT and DELETE was something devised to be used, ended up on the RFC, but not widely implemented. I never saw it working anywhere, and all my servers reply with "HTTP 405 - Method not allowed" when I try PUT or DELETE. If your systems have PUT and/or DELETE enabled, you should disable them. Or redirect to a honeypot somewhere and have some fun. If you redirect, you could send us the results later. I love seeing honeypot logs... Mauro http://mauro.limeiratem.com - registered Linux User: 294521 Scripture is both history, and a love letter from God. 2014-05-07 11:08 GMT-03:00 William Muriithi <[email protected]>: > Morning, > > I am curious to hear what opinion or experience this group has on > disabling HTTP put and delete method. > > Essentially, last week, I scanned around to see if there is weakness on > the systems I support that's exposed to the public. I am looking through > the results and it feel like put and delete shouldn't be enabled. The lines > below appear across all the systems results > > + OSVDB-397: HTTP method ('Allow' Header): 'PUT' method could allow > clients to save files on the web server. > + OSVDB-5646: HTTP method ('Allow' Header): 'DELETE' may allow clients to > remove files on the web server. > > To be sincere I don't see a problem with put and delete from a bit of > Googling I have done. Seem you can do the same damage through post that you > can execute using put and delete yet, we don't disable the former. > > What is your opinion or experience with the two HTTP methods? Would > appreciate some enlightenment/criticism here. > > Thanks in advance. > > William >