Tech Press Rushes To Cover New Linus Torvalds Mailing List Outburst

Peter Reutemann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.waikato
Message-ID <CAHoQ12K7B_0=-atbZ3vfi7qkrW7hnrxtXBbkc8pxkDmNtCsKhg@mail.gmail.com>
'"Linux frontman Linus Torvalds thinks he's 'more self-aware' these
days and is 'trying to be less forceful' after his brief absence from
directing Linux kernel developers because of his abusive language on
the Linux kernel mailing list," reports ZDNet.

"But true to his word, he's still not necessarily diplomatic in his
communications with maintainers..."

Torvalds' post-hiatus outburst was directed at Dave Chinner, an
Australian programmer who maintains the Silicon Graphics (SGI)-created
XFS file system supported by many Linux distros. "Bullshit, Dave,"
Torvalds told Chinner on a mailing list. The comment from Chinner that
triggered Torvalds' rebuke was that "the page cache is still far, far
slower than direct IO" -- a problem Chinner thinks will become more
apparent with the arrival of the newish storage-motherboard interface
specification known as Peripheral Express Interconnect Express (PCIe)
version 4.0. Chinner believes page cache might be necessary to support
disk-based storage, but that it has a performance cost....

"You've made that claim before, and it's been complete bullshit before
too, and I've called you out on it then too," wrote Torvalds. "Why do
you continue to make this obviously garbage argument?" According to
Torvalds, the page cache serves its correct purpose as a cache. "The
key word in the 'page cache' name is 'cache'," wrote Torvalds....
"Caches work, Dave. Anybody who thinks caches don't work is
incompetent. 99 percent of all filesystem accesses are cached, and
they never do any IO at all, and the page cache handles them
beautifully," Torvalds wrote.

"When you say the page cache is slower than direct IO, it's because
you don't even see or care about the *fast* case. You only get
involved once there is actual IO to be done."
"The thing is," reports the Register, "crucially, Chinner was talking
in the context of specific IO requests that just don't cache well, and
noted that these inefficiencies could become more obvious as the
deployment of PCIe 4.0-connected non-volatile storage memory spreads."

Here's how Chinner responded to Torvalds on the mailing list. "You've
taken one single statement I made from a huge email about complexities
in dealing with IO concurrency, the page cache and architectural flaws
in the existing code, quoted it out of context, fabricated a
completely new context and started ranting about how I know nothing
about how caches or the page cache work."

The Register notes their conversation also illustrates a crucial
difference from closed-source software development. "[D]ue to the open
nature of the Linux kernel, Linus's rows and spats play out in public
for everyone to see, and vultures like us to write up about."'

-- source: https://news.slashdot.org/story/19/06/28/2339245

Cheers, Peter
-- 
Peter Reutemann
Dept. of Computer Science
University of Waikato, NZ
+64 (7) 858-5174
http://www.cms.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/
http://www.data-mining.co.nz/
_______________________________________________
wlug mailing list | [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.