Re: Google Chrome Proposes 'Privacy Sandbox' To Reform Advertising Evils
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:07:44 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.waikato |
|---|---|
| Organization | Geek Central |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:47:26 +1200, Peter Reutemann quoted:
> 'Google's Chrome team proposed a "privacy sandbox" Thursday that's
> designed to give us the best of both worlds: ads that publishers can
> target toward our interests but that don't infringe our privacy.'
A detailed riposte
<https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2019/08/23/deconstructing-googles-excuses-on-tracking-protection/>,
which among other things says:
Cookie blocking does not undermine web privacy. Google’s claim to
the contrary is privacy gaslighting.
...
Google has not devised an innovative way to balance privacy and
advertising; it is latching onto prior approaches that it
previously disclaimed as impractical.
Also note this:
If the benchmark is original design intent, let’s be clear: cookies
were not supposed to enable third-party tracking, and browsers were
supposed to block third-party cookies. We know this because the
authors of the original cookie technical specification said so (RFC
2109, Section 4.3.5).
_______________________________________________
wlug mailing list | [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug