Re: Bug In Python Script May Have Affected Hundreds Of Studies

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:49:11 +1300
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.waikato
Organization Geek Central
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:42:59 +1300, Peter Reutemann wrote:

> The upside: the script was made available with the study.
> Lots of studies cannot be replicated due to data and/or
> scripts/programs not being made available as well. Hence the "open
> science" movement (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_science).

Nice discussion here
<https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/10/a-tale-of-two-retractions/>
about what happens to their articles reporting on research results which
are subsequently retracted. Turns out there’s a whole “Retraction Watch”
website that reports on retracted papers, but it doesn’t always make
clear why they were withdrawn. This information, too, can be
scientifically useful, as guides on how not to make the same
mistakes again.
_______________________________________________
wlug mailing list -- [email protected] | To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://list.waikato.ac.nz/postorius/lists/wlug.list.waikato.ac.nz