Open Source Initiative Co-Founder Bruce Perens Resigns, Citing Move Toward License 'That Isn't Freedom Respecting'

'Bruce Perens (Slashdot reader #3872) co-founded the Open Source
Initiative with Eric Raymond in 1998. But on Thursday Perens posted
"it seems to me that the organization is rather enthusiastically
headed toward accepting a license that isn't freedom respecting. Fine,
do it without me, please.

"I asked Patrick to cancel my membership, and I would have
unsubscribed from OSI lists, including this one, if your server was
working..."

The issue is a new software license drafted by lawyer Van Lindberg
called the Cryptographic Autonomy License (or CAL).

Another open-source-community leader familiar with the debate -- who
spoke with The Register on condition of anonymity -- claimed Lindberg
lobbied OSI directors privately to green-light the license, contrary
to an approval process that's supposed to be carried out in public.

"I don't think that's an appropriate characterization," said Lindberg,
of law firm Dykema, in a phone interview with The Register. "I think
there are number of people who from the beginning made up their minds
about the Cryptographic Autonomy License. You'll see a lot of people
jumping onto any pretext they can find in order to oppose it. With
regard to this idea of lobbying, there have been procedural-type
communications that I think are entirely reasonable," he added. "But
all the substantive debate has been on the license review and license
discussion forums...."

Perens said he resigned because the OSI appears to have already
decided to accept the license. He said he's headed in a different
direction, which he called "coherent open source."

"We've gone the wrong way with licensing," he said, citing the
proliferation of software licenses. He believes just three are
necessary, AGPLv3, the LGPLv3, and Apache v2.

Meanwhile, the Cryptographic Autonomy License is envisioned for use
with the distributed development platform Holo, notes the Register:

According to Holo co-founder Arthur Brock, distributed peer-to-peer
software needs a license that addresses cryptographic key rights,
which is why the Cryptographic Autonomy License has been proposed. "We
are trying to say: the only valid way to use our code is if that
developer's end-users are the sole authors and controllers of their
own private crypto keys," he wrote in a post last year.

Lindberg said the Cryptographic Autonomy License is applicable to
current web applications but it more meaningful in the context of
distributed workloads and distributed computation, which he contends
will become more important as people seek alternatives to the
centralization of today's cloud-based systems. "A lot of people are
very concerned about this concept of owning your data, owning your
computer, having the ability to really control your computing
experience and have it not be controlled by your cloud provider," said
Lindberg.

Perens said, "It's a good goal but it means you now need to have a
lawyer to understand the license and to respond to your users."

Slashdot asked Bruce Perens for details on "Coherent Open Source."
Here's what he wrote back...'

-- source: https://news.slashdot.org/story/20/01/05/208249

Cheers, Peter
-- 
Peter Reutemann
Dept. of Computer Science
University of Waikato, NZ
+64 (7) 858-5174
http://www.cms.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/
http://www.data-mining.co.nz/
_______________________________________________
wlug mailing list -- [email protected] | To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://list.waikato.ac.nz/postorius/lists/wlug.list.waikato.ac.nz