| Newsgroups |
gmane.org.user-groups.luni.tech |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 08:54 AM, Martin Maney wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 03:42:21PM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/29/2010 12:41 PM, Martin Maney wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:06:05PM -0500, Adam Jenkins wrote:
>>>> Then I don't know. I think it's wrong to just claim the man lied. The
>>>
>>> Yeah, boorish. Nekulturny.
>>>
>>> I did find it interesting that this guy with a large "I love me" sig
>>> block and an obvious axe to grind came out of nowhere to call OP a
>>> liar. I would think that someone with so many wonderful certifications
>>> would be known to us if he were an actual participant here, but I can't
>>> recall ever seeing him before.
>>
>> Whoa, time out, there, sparky. I didn't call the OP a liar. I said I
>> can't believe that RHCE certified folks are as clueless as he said. Big
>> difference.
>
> /me coughs
>
> <quote>
> I'm sorry, but I just can't believe this claim. The RHCT/E exams are
> both 100% performance based. There is no "cram for the exam" - you
> either can perform the tasks on live systems, or you can't.
> </quote>
>
> I'm not the only one who read this a calling OP a liar, and I still
> can't see that that's an unreasonable reaction to what you actually
> wrote. What you meant might be different, but we can't read your mind.
>
>> I have no doubt that his impression is exactly as he
>> stated. I do have a lot of doubt that folks who passed a *legit* RHCE
>> exam would not be qualified.
>
> So now you're stepping back to saying OP lied about verifying the
> applicant's credentials? I know, I know, you don't mean to be all
> self-righteous and *right*, but you can't seem to help but write that
> way. Is it any wonder that we form an unflattering opinion of you on
> this basis?
>
>> As you can probably guess from the delay in answering, I don't check
>> this folder very often. I manage the Solutions Architect team at Red
>> Hat which covers the central US, including Chicago. I like to try to
>> keep up with the local LUGs. I wish I had more time to do so, but I
>> don't get to post here very often.
>
> And when you do you seem to post hurriedly, leaving an impression that
> you surely cannot wish to cultivate. If you don't have time to do it
> right, it might be better not to do it at all. And really, I'd just as
> soon there were a helpful Red Hat/Fedora authority around here. It
> hasn't been the same since Spot got sucked upstairs. :-/
>
I don't get to catch up on mailing lists much these days. And when I do,
being accused of stupid crap like this certainly doesn't lead to my
wanting to catch up any more.
Anyway, I subscribed to this list a long time ago to post some job
listings. Those jobs have long since been filled. Peace.
- --
Thomas Cameron, RHCA, RHCDS, RHCVA, RHCX, CNE, MCSE, MCT
Managing Solutions Architect
512-241-0774 office / 512-585-5631 cell / 512-857-1345 fax
http://people.redhat.com/tcameron/
IRC: choirboy / AIM: rhelguy / Yahoo: rhce_guy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkyc10AACgkQmzle50YHwaAn1QCdFqQSK0oCH2p0x/H/FsYfXrBD
PSMAoM2jW2l3a/FgPWd0cuaUY9+tvZuB
=e2pc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Linux Users Of Northern Illinois (Chicago) - Technical Discussion
http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni