Re: Home ethernet
Ian K <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:21:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.luni.tech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'd recommend putting in Cat 6 or Cat 5e. 1G is generally way more than enough inside the home. Then setting up wifi points is easy depending on where everyone will be. I ran Cat 5e to most every room in the house and it has been a godsend for networking needs. You only need one connection in a room unless you have time/space to run more. These boxes also hold the coax for TV & phone lines. That's a good 4 slots normally in a normal box. 2 Coax, 1 Phone & 1 Ethernet. On 3/6/2011 7:45 PM, Larry Garfield wrote: > Greetings, geeks. > > I have recently purchased a house (I'm still in shock), and having some > renovations done before I move in. One I am strongly considering is adding > ethernet wiring in key locations, on the grounds that the electrician is > already there messing around inside the walls so I may as well. > > Has anyone else done this before? Any major warnings about what not to do? > > I'm also debating the cable grade to use. On the one hand, I figure I should > go for the highest grade available so that I don't have to do this again, > which would be Cat 7. However, as I understand it Cat 7 is still quite > expensive for the wire itself, and according to Wikipedia at least is not as > big a leap over Cat 5 or Cat 6 as it's marketed as: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_7_cable > > My understanding had been that Cat 6 wasn't truly standardized, just a > marketing term, but Wikipedia again disagrees there: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_6 > > I've long since given up being a networking geek and moved on to being a web > programming geek, so I'm a bit out of my element here. Any advise or > experience anyone has to share would be most appreciated. > > --Larry Garfield -- Linux Users Of Northern Illinois (Chicago) - Technical Discussion http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni