Re: Good IMAP hosts
Larry Garfield <[email protected]> Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:20:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.luni.tech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday, March 27, 2011 12:46:29 pm luther rochester wrote: > > It turns out that Comcast is going to be somewhat delayed in hooking up > > Internet access at the new house. I can survive myself without home > > Internet for a few days (it will probably do me good), but at present I > > run my own mail server in my living room. Having that offline for a few > > days would be very not good, as I'm not the only one that uses it. > > > > I figure this is a good opportunity to look into 3rd party mail hosts, > > something I've been meaning to do for a while. While I could just grab a > > random VPS somewhere and install my own mail server again, in the past > > that's been a full day project (dear god I hate mail servers) and it's > > not something I'd be looking forward to. So, that means a full on mail > > host. > > > > What I would need: > > > > - I have my own domain and mail dns, and want to keep using it. > > - I have a metric assload of mail archives, which I want to preserve, so > > a large capacity. > > - IMAP access. (I don't care of it has POP, but I do want fast IMAP.) > > - Server-side mail filtering. I don't mean spam (although that too), but > > the ability to filter mail into folders server-side rather than relying > > on my desktop mail client to do it. > > - A webmail client that doesn't suck (read: Not SquirrelMail.) > > - Not one of the megacorps that owns the Interwebs. (Vis, not Google). I > > don't trust them with their increasing power. > > - Other PIM integration is fine, but not required. > > > > A for-pay service is fine if it's worth it. > > > > Does the above description ring any bells? > > I did a ton of research on this before switching to Fastmail about 18 > months now for a domain approx. 35 accounts, and I'm very happy. It's > *nix-based, very fast, great IMAP, and has a lot of configurable > functionality. The web interface is kind of different but very usable > and flexible. The only thing in your list I'm not sure about is the disk > space. I think the pro accounts are 15 gig max. They were bought by > Opera last year, but I haven't seen any change in service (and Opera > isn't a megacorp, is it?). 15 gigs per account should be fine. And no, Opera's not one of the big evil yet. :-) (Google, MS, Apple, and Facebook are the Modern Internet Megacorps, and I distrust all of them. That's why I haven't switched to Google Mail in all these years.) --Larry Garfield -- Linux Users Of Northern Illinois (Chicago) - Technical Discussion http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni