Re: How best to accomplish this
Julie Bell <[email protected]> Tue, 3 May 2011 13:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.luni.tech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
While I am not a "true" network person. A possible hardware solution: Network A 192.168.10.1 on one router Network B 192.168.2.0 on your main router hooked to internet the Internet Port on Network A router is hooked to the Network B so that internet can be accessed, but they really can't see each other because of different subnets separated by the routers. ________________________________ From: Mike Scott <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2011 11:18 AM Subject: [LUNI] How best to accomplish this Okay, here is the setup. --------- --------- ----------------- | LAN-B |-----| LAN-A |-----| Teh Internets | --------- --------- ----------------- I have a network, LAN-A for general-purpose use, including internet access. I want a more restricted LAN, LAN-B, that can also access the internet, but is firewalled and appears to LAN-A and the web as a single NAT address. This is your basic home Broadband/DSL router stuff, but here's where I am hitting a snag. I want to make all IP addresses on LAN-A unreachable by LAN-B. LAN-B can only access destinations *not* on the LAN-A subnet. I am currently doing this with a PC running Coyote Linux and while it works, I would like to use a small appliance rather than tie up a PC for this purpose. I have looked at a few routers and I think the last part is going to require re-flash of the firmware with either dd-WRT or Open-WRT, which I am not averse to doing. Does anyone know if those distros will do this, or if the Coyote Linux firewall has been ported to a commercial router (i.e. low cost)? - Mike Scott -- Linux Users Of Northern Illinois (Chicago) - Technical Discussion http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni -- Linux Users Of Northern Illinois (Chicago) - Technical Discussion http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni