Re: Anyone using x.org?
Rick Miles <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.mlug.main |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Slack changed over May last year in current which became 10.1. Out of curiosity I checked log and there was nothing else that was done or changed except remove XFree86-4.4.0 and add X11R6.7.0 from X.Org. I have never noticed a difference, configuration and xorg.conf looks the same. That being said there were some compatibility problems noted in the change log. To quote: "Nearly everyone else is going with X.Org and it seems to me that sticking with XFree86 it spite of this would be asking for compatibility trouble (indeed, we saw some issues between X.Org and XFree86 4.4.0 until a few things in XFree86 were patched). I also noticed that the ATI Radeon binary drivers designed for XFree86 4.3.0 do not work with XFree86 4.4.0, but do work with the X.Org release." Sam Varghese is a darn nice person I don't care what anybody says! > A couple of days back I decided to switch from xfree to x.org > with rather disastrous results. I thought of the switch after finding > that x.org had come into Debian testing which is what I use on my PC at > home. > > Alas, it all went wrong and I lost even the GUI which I was using. > Getting it back was a pain as many of the old xfree packages are now > deprecated and no longer available. > > Anybody on the list who's switched over successfully? > > Sam -- Cheers, Rick Miles Movement stopped is no movement, and rest set in motion is no rest. Written on Boomtime, the 73rd of Bureaucracy, 3171 http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~rickfrm/