Re: Something to think of when you have a problem accessing web sites
Laurie Savage <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.mlug.main |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:44:01AM +1100 or thereabouts, Rod Smart wrote: > > > >>> [email protected] 29/10/2005 9:01:15 pm >>> > Rick Miles wrote: > > Rod, > > > > It may be my post that you were thinking of which was made after not > being > > able to access my bills online. Even though I was able to do my > netbanking > > with C'wealth, the subcontractor presenting bills had the > uncooperative > > website. > > My view is that businesses, ngo's and govts who provide interface > with the > > public should have an onus to do so in a non restrictive manner. > > It's amazing what bribery can achieve. ;-) > > -- > regards > Robert G. Moonen > registered Linux user number 298132 > > > > As far as I can see, restricting access to a "certain" type of > browser/video viewer is the same as only having steps into a public > place or other obstacles, your restricting access to those who are less > fortunate, wether its monetary or physical. > > Is the Apple MAC OS-X running a UNiX derivative and not a MS-windows > platform as such, then those who chose those system are now > disadvantaged. > > All this should be seen in the same light as for special parking spaces > and accessability ramps, instead of physical accessability, its > electronic access. > > Ok, I'll shut up now for the next few months :P > > _______________________________________________ > Melbourne Linux Users Group (Australia) > Edit your settings: http://lists.mlug.org.au I think there is a legal requirement to make all sites accessible. -- Laurie Savage ============================================= Physics/IT Teacher, Pascoe Vale Girls College Pascoe Vale, Victoria. +613 9306 2544 =============================================