Re: Reason I anonymised the lists.

Hi Cambo,
that's weird. Usually you can configure mailing lists to either have
the reply-to header line set to the list address or the sender address.
The old configuration already had the reply-to line set to the list
address. I know that Outlook tends to do strange things but I would
think that you could get it to use reply-to addresses.

I would also prefer to have a list that is not anonymised because it
leaves you the option to write back privately.

Cheers,
Christian

P.S.: On Sylpheed Claws I can actually configure that I always want to
post to the list address, no matter what the reply-to says. Maybe
Outlook can do that as well?

Am Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:17:40 +1000
schrieb [email protected]:

> Hi Christian
> There was/is. It is a personal reason. It was annoying me that I
> couldn't just click "Reply" to reply to the list on a post.
> "Reply" went to the original sender instead. 
> If everyone wants the lists to show email addresses again, I can turn
> them back on. 
> (otherwise I am really happy I could just "Reply" to this post.)
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Cambo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 September 2006 7:27 PM
> To: Melbourne Linux Users Group
> Subject: Re: [MLUG] Please Ignore this test post.
> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> is there a particular reason why you have anonymised the list a few
> days ago?
> 
> Cheers,
> Christian
> 
> Am Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:56:41 +1000
> schrieb [email protected]:
> 
> > Test Post. Please ignore.
> > 
> > J. Mark Campbell
> > Administrator - MLUG
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Melbourne Linux Users Group (Australia)
> MLUG Web Site: http://www.mlug.org.au/
> Edit your settings: http://lists.mlug.org.au
>