Re: RAID5 - ATA vs SATA
Andres Paglayan <andres-pMggkaTgBv1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.nmlug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
from the linux raid how to: only one ide device per bus in a raid, one malfunctioning can bring the other unusable too, (you can use a pci ide card though) hdparm -t device should give you speed info, On Dec 1, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Tim Emerick wrote: > I've been contemplating converting my 2 disk raid1 to a 4 disk > raid5. Couple of questions to those in the know. > > Machine: Intel P4 1.5Ghz Stepping 02, 512meg ram, 2-WD 80GB UDMA/ > 100 raid1 mirror using debian testing. > > Usage: General office/campus use as a samba file server. About 150 > PC's connected to it with maybe 20-30 users max performing > simultaneous read/writes. Activity is mostly database type with > small read/writes. Others are accessing office type documents. > > With a 4 disk raid5 array (safety matters ya know). Will I notice > a huge difference in read/write speed from what I have now or just > nominal? > > Does SATA vs ATA make a big difference? > > I'm pretty sure the bottleneck at this point is the sluggish disk > access but how can I verify that it's the disks and not a saturated > network connection? I've been using a utility called bwm-ng to > monitor bandwidth and have not seen it come close to the 100mb/s > that my NIC is rated. > > Thanks for any insights. > > Tim Emerick > > > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. > _______________________________________________ > NMLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.nmlug.org/mailman/listinfo/nmlug _______________________________________________ NMLUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.nmlug.org/mailman/listinfo/nmlug