Re: [NMOSUG-L] Renting virtual appliances instead of VPSs?
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.nmlug |
|---|---|
| Organization | icecavern.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 19:32, James Hamilton wrote: > Wesley, what types of systems do you run your virtual hosts on (# of > cpu's amount of physical ram etc.)? Seems like you could really get a > lot of bang for your buck going that route at home as opposed to the > closet full of old cobbled systems. Well, I have various uses for virtual machines, not all hosting. If I'm setting something up for "real" use, generally just getting something with multiple-processors and as much RAM as possible is a good bet. But for example, I've got one host that can handle running 5-10 virtual machines with a moderate-light load on each that's a dual-core amd64 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+) w/ 2GiB RAM. I've also run 3 virtual hosts off a dual-core PIII-700 1 GiB system in the past with no problem, but it was very basic, low-footprint stuff like serving DNS, XMPP, etc. On the other hand, closets full of old cobbled systems isn't too bad for the low-budget penny-pincher, since they can often be had for cheap or free, and a PII-400 w/ 256 MiB on it's own can outperform a virtual machine on a shared host for many tasks. This isn't "corporate" friendly, of course. ;) -- Wesley J. Landaker <[email protected]> <xmpp:[email protected]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2 _______________________________________________ NMLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.b9.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nmlug
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGHXfB8KmKTEzW49IRAqbZAJ4r4gsl1S7ybfxA85z0XEqgWBqJVQCgiqVn cM4QfKaMdNevJ4iY4nZ6KTc= =mIZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----