Re: e-mail and digital ID's (signing and encrypting)
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.nmlug |
|---|---|
| Organization | icecavern.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 15:59:18 Ed Heron wrote: > We've got a certificate for our domain. We should be able to produce > individual 'digital ID's for employees. I realize this doesn't make > additional money for the CA's, but we'll leave the philosophy out of it > for the moment, ok? If we were to pay for digital ID's for all > employees, at $20/year/employee, it could quickly get out of control. > I'm not going to get approval to spend $1600/year on it. I can barely > get approval for $500 for a multiple server certificate for our web farm. First of all, never pay for certs, it's not worth it and doesn't give you *any* added technical or security benefits. If you are doing S/MIME, be your own CA, or use CAcert: http://www.cacert.org/ If you are smarter and are doing OpenPGP: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2440.txt http://www.gnupg.org/ ... etc ... -- Wesley J. Landaker <[email protected]> <xmpp:[email protected]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2 _______________________________________________ NMLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.b9.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nmlug
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGzNu+8KmKTEzW49IRAigqAJ90xtwVQK+VhhIMalYuiNjtmfZ9MgCbB5+l KzRzw/EDuXkkVd+xCTGFwO0= =yYe5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----