Re: windoze remote desktop alternatives?

Ben <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.slug.chat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It's the 64 upstream that'll be the killer, but RDP will even work
over dialup. Just drop all the quality settings (configuration is
client side), reduce colours, no background, use classic interface not
XP shininess, etc. and it's all good.

VNC seems to be slower, in my experience.

I RDP from Mac (client) to Win2K3 and WinXP RDP servers and it works
fine. I use TSclientX from the Mac, because the Microsoft provided Mac
client has a bug with drive mappings that irritates other users when
the server is hosting multiple RDP sessions.

Plenty of RDP client options for Mac and Linux and the standard mstsc
works fine on Windows.

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Voytek Eymont <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 7:09 am, Yama wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 at 06:58, "Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> I need to setup remote access between two standalone windoze, vista and
>>> XP;
>
>>> is microsoft's 'remote desktop' the way to go, or can anyone suggest a
>>> better alternative ?
>>
>> VNC is probably better, being an open protocol.
>
> this is just a 'plain jane' system for a manager who needs to access her
> work PC from home, that's all; both machines are standalone PCs, Vista and
> XP
> I just want something basic and simple to use
>
> anyhow, I intend to try them all, just for my own benefit if nothing else
>
> any thought on what's the minimum bandwidth for such remote access, should
> 256 ADSL be enough?
>
>
> --
> Voytek
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
>
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.