Re: [activities] Nomination: Michael Chesterton
James Dumay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.slug.festivities |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I really had no idea of the incident. I withdraw my nomination. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:15 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/3/9 Harrison Conlin <[email protected]>: >>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Lindsay Holmwood >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I enjoy passive-aggressiveness as much as the next person, but could > you please enumerate your concerns? >>> Sure. In IRC, he regularly shouts out the name of male genitalia, and > frequently makes sexual innuendos. Also, last month he was removed from > the channel for doing an action of patting a female on the rear in a > sexist manner. >> >> I wasn't going to say anything, but since the topic was raised... >> >> It wasn't the rear, it was the front :( > > For those who do not know the context of this, the term used was 'fanny'. > > The interpretation of that word depends greatly where you take your > reference from: > > * The definition I grew up with, which I believe has en-gb heritage, does > mean the front [0]. > > * However, if using the en-us definition (which due to Americanisation now > appears the predominantly accepted definition in .au), it is the rear [1]. > > In my experience, most people in .au do know both definitions of the word. > I find that those who choose to use it do so in ambiguous situations for > maximum shock/confusion/insult value -- with the intent on claiming the US > definition as their defense. > > I am choosing to take the stance of 'assuming stupidity rather than > malice' in this instance, and hoping that Chesty merely meant the poor > girl's rear... > > ... which is *still* inappropriate, and should not be tolerated. At all. > >> >> Honestly, given the efforts we've been making in terms of addressing > gender imbalance issues in the past couple of years, I think it would be > a massive step backwards if such behaviour was rewarded. >> > > I agree wholeheartedly with this. > > I'd also like to point out that *everyone* can provide assistance to SLUG > and helping does not require Committee membership [2]. > > > -- > [0] Sorry, no link since I'm at work, and my desk is alongside the main > thoroughfare. I did try search 'nomenclature fanny' but the results did > not seem SFW, although the text for them might provide insight. Feel free > to Google for yourself though. > > [1] My mother has an amusing story from a seminar she attended many many > moons ago, where the speaker was an US American who complained how sore > his 'fanny' was from the longhaul flight. > > -- > Melissa Draper > > w: http://meldraweb.com & http://geekosophical.net > p: +61 4 0359 5395 > > -- > SLUG Activities > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > -- SLUG Activities Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html