Re: [activities] Re: [SLUG] Motion to be put at the AGM: Wind up SLUG

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:33 PM, dave b <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hum I think the subject(of this email thread) of "Wind up SLUG"
> doesn't really fit. James is trying to put slug under LA so that the
> cost of insurance is absorbed by LA.

But an essential part of that is winding up the organisation currently
known as SLUG, and that's what the motion is about.

There is context around the motion, which is as you describe - but the
motion itself is specifically about whether or not we should wind up
the association, and under what circumstances we should do that.

> --
> SLUG Activities
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
>
-- 
SLUG Activities
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html