Re: Question on lithium ion batteries.
Jake Anderson <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:47:08 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.slug.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I should probably add, Really new, and perhaps better quality laptops /may/ have better charge circuits, that won't try and charge a 95% charged battery again, thus saving it from the early death suffered from leaving the battery in a wall powered laptop. Generally speaking you should expect ~30% battery capacity loss after a year, and ~50% or more after 2 years in a battery that has been looked after but still used, better quality cells will fair better than this. On 24/01/15 01:44, Jake Anderson wrote: > over discharging will cause damage > over charging will also cause damage (but less so) > > > If the laptop is going to sit on your desk plugged into power for 90% > of its life, run the battery down a bit (like to 50% charge), then > turn the laptop off and take the battery out (assuming you want it to > last when you go on the road), Once every few months, charge it up, > run it down to about 20%, charge it again, then run it back down to > 50% and take it out. Leaving the thing on charge all the time will > generally kill it. > > The more you discharge the battery the less lifespan it will have, so > if you can charge it at 50% all the time (assuming you are a regular > user of said battery) it'll last longer than if you discharge it to > flat every time. I reckon with modern batteries 30% charge is probably > a good cutoff point in terms of cycle life vs calendar life. > > Every once in a while running it down to flat or nearly so then > charging again isn't a bad thing, it'll slightly increase the capacity > (this is a real effect, we see it on unpackaged lipoly cells we use in > robots, its not the memory effect, its something else, but a cell > thats been sitting for a while or only lightly used will gain ~30% > capacity with some "exercise") and more importantly let the fancy > chips in the battery re-calibrate their calculation of the capacity of > the battery. > > generally discharging or charging cause damage, but the damage gets > worse the further from the middle you go, when they want a really long > life from cells, they run them just around the middle range, like from > 40% charge to 80% charge, with consumer lithium cells you will > generally hit calendar life issues before cycle life if you don't go > nuts. > > > btw the memory effect is a specific thing for nicad cells that was > discovered when the batteries were discharged to *exactly* the same > point over and over again (say 20% state of charge), then when > expected to discharge past that point they had practically no > remaining capacity. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_effect#True_memory_effect > > On 23/01/15 18:15, William Bennett wrote: >> Menno, >> >> Thanks for the information. >> >> I will add this: you'd be surprised how many computer experts, >> professionals included, >> >> labouring under this misapprehension. >> >> I asked around because I had been told of the existence of “memory”, but >> felt that the >> >> manufacturers should know what they were talking about. >> >> >> William. >> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:42 PM, William Bennett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> So, having absorbed, from my friends, the dangers of partially >>> recharging a lithium-ion battery due to “memory”, I read the insert >>> that >>> came with the new laptop battery: – >>> >>> “Recharging a partially charged lithium-ion does not cause harm because >>> there is no memory. Short battery life is mainly caused by heat >>> rather than >>> charge/discharge patterns.” >>> >>> Um, who's right? >>> >>> William Bennett, >>> Armidale. >>> > -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html