Re: learning Hibernate
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.trijug.juglist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20060816014421.SDUW8074.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> |
OK, I had not heard JPA was done. I agree JDO is not part of J2EE or J2SE, largely due to politics of the EJB app server and relational DB community. But we all use a number of Java facilities that are not part of J2EE and J2SE. > From: Don Brady <dbrady-d0/1ywxyuRNWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> > Date: 2006/08/15 Tue PM 07:49:21 EDT > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Juglist] learning Hibernate > > > >I'd encourage people to compare JDO and JPA. My understanding is > >that JDO has much richer modeling capabilities. JDO is a 2.0 > >product, JPA is not even released as 1.0 yet (as far as I know). If > >you don't like the queries of Hibernate (very SQL based), you will > >not like the queries of JPA. > > > Just as footnote, the JPA spec. is final and the reference > implementation is included in the Sun J2EE 5 Sun Java System > Application Server Platform Edition 9. > > People who use JPA will eventually be able to run their code > unchanged under BEA, JBoss, IBM WebSphere, Sun, Toplink, Hibernate, > and any J2SE 6, which is a huge attraction. > > JDO has good things too, but is not included in J2EE or J2SE. > > As has been pointed out, it is somewhat apples and oranges in any > case because they are very different. > > Coming down the road, we also have SDO, which is tied to SCA. It > is more language independent but I think a bit more like JDO than > SDO, though again a different target. SCA is IBM and BEA and > others, and Sun just joined too..... > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Juglist mailing list > [email protected] > http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org >