Re: Speaking of Jason Rudolph and Groovy...

"Ed Burnette" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.trijug.juglist
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>From Digg:
> It's a free eBook (pdf), including code samples. Of course
> you may also support his work, by buying the printed copy.

As a reader, that's great. I love free ($0) stuff. I can download it without even thinking about it and use it at my leisure.

As an author, how does that work? Many people asked for a free copy of my GWT book (http://pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/ebgwt), or complained that it wasn't free (it's $8.50). What's my incentive for spending months working on something, putting it out there for free, and everybody says "thanks", takes it, and walks off? I could be wrong but I can't see many of the free downloads converting to sales.

Unlike open source code, the book has no value to me once it's written since I already know the subject. So I'm not "scratching an itch". I could spend that time blogging, writing code, hanging out on the newsgroups, giving presentations, or something else, and that might be more productive for me personally or for the community.

Thoughts?

Aside: http://www.infoq.com/minibooks/grails says 'download this book free' but http://www.lulu.com/content/618462 says the download is $12.80, what's up with that?

Aside2: For groovy fans, I've heard good things about Groovy in Action, http://www.manning.com/koenig/ . 

-----Original Message-----

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:49:53 -0500
From: Jared Richardson <[email protected]>
Subject: [Juglist] Speaking of Jason Rudolph and Groovy...
To: Harold Meder <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]


Jason's book just came out!

If you're the digging sort, have at it.

http://digg.com/programming/InfoQ_eBook_Getting_Started_with_Grails

Jared
http://JaredRichardson.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.