Re: Which Continuous Integration tool?

For what it's worth I had to set up a new CI environment in a shop
that previously had none. I've documented some of what we've done
here:

http://hartsock.blogspot.com/2007/08/getting-fit-and-groovy.html

I went with Hudson because of how simple it was to set up along side
Fitnesse and I went with Groovy for the Fixture code.

I don't know how applicable this is to what other folks are doing but
perhaps it gives someone an idea.

On 9/4/07, Phillip Rhodes <[email protected]> wrote:
> The issue of CI tools has come up a couple of times recently
> on #trijug IRC, which led me to realize that some other folks
> might find these couple of links handy.  This is some stuff
> I dredged up when trying to decide on a CI tool.
>
> <http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-11-2006/jw-1101-ci.html>
>
> <http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-ap09056/index.html>
>
> <http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix>
>
>
> TTYL,
>
>
> Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Juglist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
>
>
>


-- 
/** Shawn.Hartsock http://hartsock.blogspot.com/  //*/