Re: Feedback on Java Code Generator
Chris Bredesen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.trijug.juglist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Seam is a lot to take in at first. They "simplify" things with the seam-gen script but all that does is create you a whole stack of stuff which you don't understand any more than you did with an empty project :) If you're doing a quick and dirty "get something on the web" project I'd probably not use Seam unless you were really keen to learn it. Seam solves a lot of MVC type problems in "standard" ways and I think is only going to gain popularity (disclosure: I work for JBoss). My preference since the old days has always been against Java code generation. I can create POJO entities as fast as I can think of them so that's never been a problem. The database schema can be generated from there with any number of tools (Hibernate hbm2ddl if you're into that sort of thing). A middle-out approach I suppose you'd call it. Of course that doesn't address the CRUD code generation like Seam/[G]rails but really how hard is CRUD code to write? The more involved stuff is the page flow logic which you can't generate (yet). -Chris Shawn Hartsock wrote: > I found it very difficult to work with. > > On Jan 8, 2008 2:45 PM, David Jordan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just curious whether anyone has tried out Seam yet from JBoss which provides >> integration of Hibernate/JPA with Ajax-enabled JSF? This seems to address >> the same issues. >