Re: Feedback on Java Code Generator

Chris Bredesen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.trijug.juglist
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Seam is a lot to take in at first. They "simplify" things with the 
seam-gen script but all that does is create you a whole stack of stuff 
which you don't understand any more than you did with an empty project :)

If you're doing a quick and dirty "get something on the web" project I'd 
probably not use Seam unless you were really keen to learn it. Seam 
solves a lot of MVC type problems in "standard" ways and I think is only 
going to gain popularity (disclosure: I work for JBoss).

My preference since the old days has always been against Java code 
generation. I can create POJO entities as fast as I can think of them so 
that's never been a problem. The database schema can be generated from 
there with any number of tools (Hibernate hbm2ddl if you're into that 
sort of thing). A middle-out approach I suppose you'd call it. Of course 
that doesn't address the CRUD code generation like Seam/[G]rails but 
really how hard is CRUD code to write? The more involved stuff is the 
page flow logic which you can't generate (yet).

-Chris

Shawn Hartsock wrote:
> I found it very difficult to work with.
>
> On Jan 8, 2008 2:45 PM, David Jordan <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Just curious whether anyone has tried out Seam yet from JBoss which provides
>> integration of Hibernate/JPA with Ajax-enabled JSF? This seems to address
>> the same issues.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.