Re: becoming a Sun Certified Java Programmer?
Tim Jowers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.trijug.juglist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Second the idea of writing code. If you don't have a degree then you definitely shoudl consider getting a cert. Few to no jobs you want as a coder will filter on a cert like this. Those that do are not run by people who know software development. Write some code. Put down what you've done on your resume. If its like what they want to do, then they will be interested. You can always put "Studying for cert xyz" on your resume. disclaimer: I've never looked at the scjp and it probably is a good test; but I've interviewed college cs graduates who cannot sling code. Amazing. My $.02, TimJowers P.S> I've interviewed tons over the last 15 years and only once a headhunter asked if I had MSCE. I said, "No, but I have a masters in computer engineering!" On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Kimsal <[email protected]> wrote: > Grant: > > I'd actually hit 'send' before I got to that part. Certainly having a lot > of demonstrable experience in an open source project is a great way to > demonstrate a number of skills - both social and technical. Even that is > still one of those things that is likely a 'foot in the door' sort of > qualifier for many employers, but certainly still great to have. > > Unfortunately, not everyone is in a position to contribute to OS projects, > either due to time constraints, or perhaps NDAs or other situations they > find themselves in. Certification is often a good fallback position to have > to be able to demonstrate knowledge and a certain degree of skill. > > Participation in various communities is a great way to show skills, but not > everyone can always participate. In those cases, certification is a good > alternative to have. Just IMO, but it's been echoed by many teammates and > hiring people I've talked to over the years. > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> In the end, I guess I would ask myself how much time and money it's going >> to take and what the opportunity cost of that is in comparison to other ways >> you might strengthen yourself. For instance, suppose it takes you 6 months >> to study for it (I don't know, I haven't taken it). In that time, you could >> join an open source project you like and start making significant >> contributions that show you know how to code/communicate in real life. If >> you pick a good project and prove yourself, in all likelihood, people will >> start asking you to work for them, instead of you asking them if they have >> work. >> I personally would rather see a candidate with a solid track record of >> contributions to an open source project that is used in production by a >> decent number of people, but that may be beside the point. Why? This >> allows me to quickly establish: >> 1. How well they communicate >> 2. They can work distributed/independently, but still interact with others >> 3. If they are self starters >> 4. If they really know how to code or just live off of their co-workers >> I think the other factor for certification is how much work experience you >> have and how up to speed you are on a good breadth/depth of technologies. >> If you are relatively inexperienced, the cert. probably can't hurt and >> might give you a little extra edge. If you've been around the block and >> have proven yourself in the past, it probably won't matter as much. >> Just my two cents, >> Grant >> > > -- > Michael Kimsal > http://jsmag.com > http://groovymag.com > 919.827.4724 - Skype > 919.455.8488 - Cell > > _______________________________________________ > Juglist mailing list > [email protected] > http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org > >