Re: Summary discussion and proposed actions for checkpoints with low implementation experience

"Jim Ley" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.agents
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Ian B. Jacobs" <[email protected]>
> We welcome additional reports of how products working
> together satisfy the checkpoints.

Snufkin also implements 3.5, 5.3, 5.5 and I have "tried" 10.5 but never
had something that "worked".

Jim.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.