Re: Meeting this week

Jon Gunderson wrote:
> There are enough people to have a quorum at a meeting this week on 
> Thursday.  The following people said they could attend:
> Tim Lacy
> Jon Gunderson
> Jim Allan
> David Poehlman
> Harvey Bingham
> 
> More are welcome!

I will be there.

  _ Ian


> We will be discussing the following editorial and clarification issues:
> Issue 544: Should we delete requirements re: fee links from UAAG 1.0 
> since not really part of Web today?
> Issue 543: [Clarification] 11.5: Forward/back one viewport for 2d 
> renderings only?
> Issue 542: [Clarification] 11.5: What does "refresh" mean, notably in 
> light of usage in 3.5
> Issue 541: [Clarification] 11.5 (default binding requirements): Moving 
> UI focus to address box sufficient
> Issue 540: [Editorial] 10.3 (indicate rendering progress): Clarify that 
> not about download progress, but position of viewport
> Issue 539: 11.6 (user profiles): Must the user profile be portable? Does 
> saving configurations suffice?
> Issue 538: [Editorial] Make checkpoint requirements distinct from 
> exceptions, sufficient conditions
> Issue 536: [Editorial] 9.7: Title is too forceful and doesn't 
> communicate key bit of checkpoint
> Issue 535: 9.4 (restore history): Must consider UA cache availability
> Issue 534: [Clarification] 9.3 (Move content focus): Clarify that "each 
> element" refers to elements in set defined in provision 1
> 


-- 
Ian Jacobs ([email protected])   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447