Re: Proposed requirements for checkpoint 6.4 (Response Required)
"Ian B. Jacobs" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.agents |
|---|---|
| Organization | W3C |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Works for me. > > Does this have to be the rendered form, the author-specified form, or are > either OK? (For example, an author may have specified two different fonts, > and the User Agent may render the first one, or the second if it lacks the > first, or neither, if it doesn't have them. Alternatively they may have been > overridden by an author style sheet, or a high-contrast setting might be > causing rendering in black and white when the autor has specified several > colours). The goal of this checkpoint is to make available what's *actually* rendered. This would be a good clarification. - Ian > > Charles > > >>Please RESPOND as soon as possible to this e-mail on whether you agree or >>disagree with the changes. >> > > -- Ian Jacobs ([email protected]) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447