Re: Proposed requirements for checkpoint 6.4 (Response Required)

"Ian B. Jacobs" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.agents
Organization W3C
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> Works  for me.
> 
> Does this have to be the rendered form, the author-specified form, or are
> either OK? (For example, an author may have specified two different fonts,
> and the User Agent may render the first one, or the second if it lacks the
> first, or neither, if it doesn't have them. Alternatively they may have been
> overridden by an author style sheet, or a high-contrast setting might be
> causing rendering in black and white when the autor has specified several
> colours).

The goal of this checkpoint is to make available what's *actually*
rendered.

This would be a good clarification.

  - Ian


> 
> Charles
> 
> 
>>Please RESPOND as soon as possible to this e-mail on whether you agree or
>>disagree with the changes.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Ian Jacobs ([email protected])   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.