Re: UAAG review comments (personal)

Richard Ishida wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> I have forwarded your responses to the i18n group comments to the i18n group for review. Thankyou.
> 
> I wanted to come back on the following:
> 
> 
>> > #ri-1:
>> > Sec 2, 1st bulleted list
>> > It would be useful to clarify the intent and normative status of 
>>the bold text that immediately follows a guideline title.
>>
>>See the beginning of section 2, which gives a succinct 
>>explanation of the normative and informative parts of each 
>>checkpoint definition.
>>
>>"Each checkpoint definition includes the following parts. Some parts 
>>are normative (i.e., relate to conformance); others are informative 
>>only. ..."
> 
> 
> I was actually referring to the text related to guidelines, not checkpoints.  
 >The first bulleted list in ch2 mentions the guideline number and 
guideline title
 >(which I assume are both inside the box), but then goes on to the 
rationale without
 >mentioning the intervening bold text (eg. From Guideline 1: 
"Ensure that the user
 >can interact with the user agent (and the content it renders) 
through different
 > input and output devices.")  It is this bold text I am querying.

Ok, thanks for the clarification. Yes, I can indicate that that's 
informative as well.

Thanks Richard,

  _ Ian



-- 
Ian Jacobs ([email protected])   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447