Re: PROPOSAL: Requirements in Checkpoint 3.5 and 3.6

Marisa DeMeglio <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.agents
Message-ID <[email protected]>
We haven't started an official UAG-implementation review of the Sigtuna 
browser, but it does make configurable the allowed number of redirects (0 
to unlimited).
But I can see how it would make sense to add this as a note on another 
checkpoint.

-marisa

At 02:11 PM 6/5/2002 -0500, Jon Gunderson wrote:

>Checkpoint 3.5 Toggle content refresh
>Checkpoint 3.6 Toggle redirects
>
>There is mixed reaction to these requirements.  Three people say keep and 
>two people say drop and add as a note to another checkpoint.
>
>PROPOSAL: I suggest we drop Checkpoint 3.6 and keep Checkpoint 3.5.  It 
>seems that this is easy to implement and was identified as a major problem 
>for screen reader users.  The requirements of checkpoint 3.6 could be a 
>note on 3.5.
>
>
>
>Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
>Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
>Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
>MC-574
>College of Applied Life Studies
>University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
>1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820
>
>Voice: (217) 244-5870
>Fax: (217) 333-0248
>
>E-mail: [email protected]
>
>WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
>WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
>

------------------------------------------
Marisa DeMeglio
[email protected]
IT Development
Information Center/JSRPD
www.dinf.org
------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.