Re: PROPOSAL: Requirements in Checkpoint 3.5 and 3.6
Marisa DeMeglio <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.agents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We haven't started an official UAG-implementation review of the Sigtuna browser, but it does make configurable the allowed number of redirects (0 to unlimited). But I can see how it would make sense to add this as a note on another checkpoint. -marisa At 02:11 PM 6/5/2002 -0500, Jon Gunderson wrote: >Checkpoint 3.5 Toggle content refresh >Checkpoint 3.6 Toggle redirects > >There is mixed reaction to these requirements. Three people say keep and >two people say drop and add as a note to another checkpoint. > >PROPOSAL: I suggest we drop Checkpoint 3.6 and keep Checkpoint 3.5. It >seems that this is easy to implement and was identified as a major problem >for screen reader users. The requirements of checkpoint 3.6 could be a >note on 3.5. > > > >Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP >Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology >Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services >MC-574 >College of Applied Life Studies >University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign >1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 > >Voice: (217) 244-5870 >Fax: (217) 333-0248 > >E-mail: [email protected] > >WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund >WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua > ------------------------------------------ Marisa DeMeglio [email protected] IT Development Information Center/JSRPD www.dinf.org ------------------------------------------