Re: Proposal for Checkpoint 5.5 Confirm form submission

"Ian B. Jacobs" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.agents
Organization W3C
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jon Gunderson wrote:
> 
> There is some sediment to drop "Checkpoint 5.5 Confirm form submission" 
> requirement.
> 
> Proposal: I suggest we add it to the requirements listed under the 
> repair label.  This is useful when there are automatic form submissions 
> and that is really an accessibility authoring problem that this 
> checkpoint is trying to repair.

Beware the slippery slope. All of the checkpoints in Guideline 5
are about making manual some automatic behavior. Indeed, that
is a *very important theme* of UAAG 1.0. We have lots of checkpoints
that amount to making some automatic behavior manual.

I do not recommend making 5.5 (or other checkpoints that
make automatic behavior manual) optional under the "repair"
label.

NOTE: If we pursue the "repair label" idea, there will not be
a perfect solution for which checkpoints are repair checkpoints
and which are not; we will simply end up choosing a set. The choice
will not be completely arbitrary, but will be subjective.


  _ Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs ([email protected])   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.