Re: Proposal for Checkpoint 5.5 Confirm form submission
"Ian B. Jacobs" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.agents |
|---|---|
| Organization | W3C |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jon Gunderson wrote: > > There is some sediment to drop "Checkpoint 5.5 Confirm form submission" > requirement. > > Proposal: I suggest we add it to the requirements listed under the > repair label. This is useful when there are automatic form submissions > and that is really an accessibility authoring problem that this > checkpoint is trying to repair. Beware the slippery slope. All of the checkpoints in Guideline 5 are about making manual some automatic behavior. Indeed, that is a *very important theme* of UAAG 1.0. We have lots of checkpoints that amount to making some automatic behavior manual. I do not recommend making 5.5 (or other checkpoints that make automatic behavior manual) optional under the "repair" label. NOTE: If we pursue the "repair label" idea, there will not be a perfect solution for which checkpoints are repair checkpoints and which are not; we will simply end up choosing a set. The choice will not be completely arbitrary, but will be subjective. _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs ([email protected]) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447