Re: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace

"Tim Roberts" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general
Message-ID <00fc01c2cc66$86b38e40$1b00a8c0@reliant>
Hi Michael,

Do Watchfire have intentions of extending  their support section.

The install documentation does seem a little bit rushed and not very
insightful, especially with regards to the generic installation of Bobby.

Although it is still (IMHO) the best in its class.

Tim





----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Cooper" <[email protected]>
To: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace


>
> Before I read this reply I was going to post a message saying we're
> considering changing Bobby's evaluation to consider links on different
lines
> (e.g., separated by <br>) as being sufficiently separated. I'm with
everyone
> on the importance of separated links, and just have the question - are
> non-whitespace separators just important for links on the same "line" or
is
> it also important for links on different lines? I realize the definition
of
> "line" might depend on the user agent and there might be my answer, that
you
> can't count on a <br> element as creating the needed separation. But I
> wanted to float the idea and see what people think.
>
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Foliot - bytown internet [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:18 AM
> > To: Steve Vosloo
> > Cc: W3c-Wai-Ig
> > Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
> >
> >
> >
> > JAWS says the word link, IBM HPR just changes the "voice" to
> > indicate that
> > the text is "different" (i.e.- Hyperlink).
> >
> > While I detest Bobby worship if you are going for strict
> > compliance you need
> > to separate the links with more than white space.  I usually
> > use the "bar"
> > (|), and often even style it "away" using CSS. (or mark up
> > your LIST of
> > links using list markup (<UL><LI>) and again style away the bullets,
> > indentation, etc. using CSS)
> >
> > The point is that there is in fact a distinct separation between the
> > hyperlinks.  This is useful for users with mobility
> > impairments as well,
> > including but not limited to Parkinson's, Arthritis,
> > quadriplegics, etc.  In
> > fact, even younger children lack fine motor skills, although with them
> > getting younger and younger at the computer screen/mouse/keyboard the
> > thresh-hold age keeps getting smaller and smaller...
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > JF
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> > > Behalf Of Steve Vosloo
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:06 AM
> > > To: WAI IG
> > > Subject: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a list of links which I'm placing on top of each other and
> > > separating with an HTML break statement, like the list of
> > links at the
> > > bottom of the Tesco Access site. Bobby squeals with WAI
> > checkpoint 10.5:
> > > Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace. Is this
> > an outdated
> > > checkpoint? My experience is that screen readers say the word "link"
> > > before reading a link.
> > >
> > > All input greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.