Re: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Jim on both points - and said so last time this was discussed in this forum - see the 4-message thread starting at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2003JanMar/0182 (two weeks ago). On Wednesday, Feb 5, 2003, at 06:39 Australia/Melbourne, Jim Ley wrote: > > > "Jonathan Chetwynd" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> >> We use absolute positioning so I'm wondering what the theory is on >> this? >> Is there any explicit separation? seems unlikely :-( > > If you're positioning with CSS, then you can easily provide characters > which > are hidden, or positioned elsewhere when css is enabled, this > requirement > obviously only applies to the non CSS-P situation. > >> and finally SVG, how are links supposed to be separated in what has >> the >> potential to be a fine mess? > > User Agents for SVG have to cope with this in a different way, they > are very > different mark-up languages, and techniques don't directly translate. > > Jim. > > > -- Charles McCathieNevile [email protected] Fundación SIDAR http://www.sidar.org