RE: Click here and other bad link texts

"Jon Hanna" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > > In the text that you have created to recommend not to use
> "click here" I
> > > think that it is important that you also explain that the
> same text of a
> > > link should not be used to point to different resources.
> >
> >Good point. One excellent "visual" demonstration of the problem
> this causes
> >can be seen using Opera 7, which offers (as part of the browser) a hotbar
> >tab to "list all links". This may convince quite a few
> "visually-dependant"
> >website developers why good descriptive link text is an advantage.
>
> Another would be to use IE and to use the option "Print table of
> links".  That tends to be an eye opener on the link text.

A contrary argument can be made for using words that flow naturally with the
text, and solving any mystery-meat issues with additional information from
title (the assumption being that whatever UA is used would make use of this
in some sensible way - I don't want to start a debate about what that
sensible way is again).

Eg:

When I finished copying it to the <a href="public/" title="web view of our
public directory">pub</a> directory I went to the <a
href="http://somePubSite.com" title="My &quot;Local&quot; - Some Public
House">pub</a>.

Not only is "Then I went to the pub." more natural language than anything
more specific, it is also possibly the text which was then hyperlinked
after-the-fact. The title *should* be enough for any UA to make the link as
explicit as suits the medium used.

Anything which lists links, such as Opera 7 or IE on printing, could make
use of the title to prevent the ambiguity of "pub".
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.